
|
|
|
| CAPACITY-BUILDING AND TRAINING
The cluster will focus on Capacity-building in Central, Eastern and Southern Europe and shared learning for and amongst local and international civil society organisations, think-tanks and academic institutions, relevant governments and bi-lateral/multi-lateral institutions. It aims to share international experience, providing support to and collaborating with networks of local organisations and facilitating access to decision-makers, as well as feeding up perspectives and realities from the ground and synthesising lessons from across different contexts in order to provide the basis for better policy and practice;
The second focus is placed on Training and awareness raising to promote and enhance skills and knowledge amongst target beneficiaries. Drawing together the collective expertise of the partners and the results of the research conducted in the project, the training will include a series of modules covering a range of thematic issues and tailored to specific audiences and contexts.
Additionally, the cluster carries the Networking role of the project in which partners will establish and strengthen networks of organisations working on conflict prevention and peacebuilding in the EU by generating dialogue among organisations, disseminating research findings, participating in conferences, exploring opportunities for collaboration, writing articles in journals, newsletters, policy briefings and the IfP website.
The IfP partners collaborating in this work are European Peacebuilding Liason Office (EPLO), La Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE), Partners for Democratic Change International (PDCI) and Hellenic Foundation for European & Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP).
Cluster coordinators: Stephanie Broughton and Daniela Kolarova |
|
LATEST CAPACITY-BUILDING AND TRAINING PUBLICATIONS |
 |
Does Peacebuilding Matter in
Development Aid? A Mapping Exercise 2009-07-10 |
|
| Ján Mihálik |
|
| Under the Capacity-Building and Training Cluster of the Initiative for Peacebuilding (IfP) case study research was conducted in Bulgaria, Czech Republic,Greece, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, and Spain in order to assess these countries’ capacities to meet EU spending targets for ODA and to analyse the position of peacebuilding within national ODA policies. The mapping serves as a comparative overview which aims to identify basic commonalities and differences between the seven case study country reports. It also draws on findings captured in the Capacity-Building and Training Cluster Synthesis Report ‘Does Peacebuilding Matter in Development Aid? |
| Download pdf |

|
 |
Does Peacebuilding Matter in Development Aid? Reflections on Official Development Assistance of Seven European Countries: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain 2009-03-16 |
|
| Ján Mihálik and Kristin van der Leest |
|
| The Synthesis Report of the Capacity-Building and Training Cluster extracts main findings from case studies of seven surveyed EU Member States: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia and Spain. The report finds that international development cooperation has received growing attention during the last decade. Donors and policy-makers at national and EU levels are also increasingly acknowledging the importance of peacebuilding to effective development assistance. Newer EU Member States are making progress in aligning their policy frameworks for ODA with international standards and enhancing institutional structures for managing and programming ODA. However, the Report highlights that more must be done to improve the participation of civil society in ODA planning and implementation processes, in increasing public awareness of and support for ODA and peacebuilding, and mainstreaming peacebuilding within all external action policies at national and EU levels. |
| Download pdf |

|
 |
Polish Official development assistance and peacebuilding 2008-12-18 |
|
| Ilona Iłowiecka-Tanska, PhD, Marta Pejda |
|
| Polish ODA is channelled to support sustainable development, including peacebuilding activities such as the promotion of democracy, human rights, good governance, independent media and strong civil society; indeed, authorities recognize and support peacebuilding as a component of Polish ODA strategy. However, Poland’s capacity to meet EU-mandated levels of ODA are severely constrained by the lack of legislation to regulate ODA procedures; the absence of a centralised body responsible for management of ODA; and reliance on annual planning and budgeting phases which limits strategic and coherent planning. These issues limit the impact of Polish ODA and hinder establishment of effective partnerships with civil society. |
| Download pdf |

|
|
|
|
|